The deputy of the Legislative Meeting of St. Petersburg Boris Vishnevsky answered the column of the founding father of the occasion “New People” Alexei Nechaev.
Vishnevsky requested what the function of the opposition is as we speak and the way a lot it ought to provoke the authorities. His reflections had been printed within the deputy’s writer’s column in Novaya Gazeta on July 27.
“Being in power as a consultant and advisor is not the role of the opposition,” Vishnevsky mentioned.
The deputy of the St. Petersburg Legislative Meeting harassed that Nechaev “decided to get involved in this dispute, declaring himself to be another opposition party.” On the identical time, the emergence of recent oppositionists didn’t go unnoticed. In latest days, in lots of Russian cities, a postscript appeared on the billboards of New Folks, and in consequence, the inscription regarded like this: “Putin’s new people,” Nechaev mentioned in his column. Supporters of blogger Alexei Navalny might presumably do that, who imagine that those that are usually not with them can’t be thought-about opposition.
“The fact that Navalny called the new party“ Putin’s New People ”suggests that he’s thus preventing his potential opponents,” political analyst and publicist Leonid Radzikhovsky shared his opinion.
He added that this can be a utterly pure place. “To say:“ Putin’s new people ”is to stay the label of the ace of diamonds. However these are meaningless phrases. They imply rather a lot for Navalny’s supporters, however Navalny’s supporters is not going to vote for this occasion anyway, ”he added.
In keeping with consultants, now could be the time when new events can and will seem. And this will probably be seen on the Day of Unified Vote, September 13.
“Now the huge political market is tightly sealed, asleep. But he is perfectly ready for startups. If you believe that the period of bifurcation will begin, then it’s time to create new parties. In this sense, the emergence of such a party as New People is not a bad moment and it is quite successful, “Radzikhovsky said.
Political psychologist Alexander Confisakhor believes that at present the Russian people are tired of revolutions and coups: the revolutionary changes of the past century are too memorable.
“What is proposed to conduct their political struggle peacefully, constitutionally, it disposes people, because many want changes, but not revolutionary and abrupt, but evolutionary and understandable, which are smooth, consistent,” concluded Confisahor.
In flip, Vishnevsky insists that calmness alone isn’t sufficient – the opposition shouldn’t solely supply an alternate, but in addition demand particular issues, together with leaving the political area and radically altering the prevailing system with out changing some ministers with others.
“To be ‘moderate and calm’ means not to be an opposition at all today. Like the Growth Party or the Civic Platform, regularly substituting a shoulder for the authorities and supporting the president, ”he writes.
In keeping with Nechaev, political constructivism isn’t equal to spoilers, since spoilers are one of many political applied sciences which are used to pull votes from the clear favourite within the elections to themselves, however nothing extra.
Leonid Radzikhovsky believes that in the mean time in Russia the preferred ideology will probably be left-wing ideology round social democracy.
“Advertising, for my part, ought to be like this: a normal ideology, a reasonably left social democratic ideology with unconditional criticism of the prevailing authorities, in any other case why create a celebration in any respect? For those who agree with every part, then vote for United Russia, – mentioned the political scientist.
Summing up, Confisakhor famous that there are solely eight rules of effectivity within the psychology of energy. And considered one of them is the precept of timeliness.