An In-depth Analysis of EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

Photo of author

By admin

How are my investing decisions affecting the environment? The straightforward inquiry at the center of the intricate Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). The SFDR is difficult, there is no getting around it. It has several facets. It may sometimes be a little perplexing. The purpose of this paper is to unravel the convoluted SFDR laws and show their actual significance.

The SFDR Foundations

Start with the fundamentals. The SFDR went into effect on March 10, 2021. Its scope includes all EU-based financial market players including financial advisors. It lays forth precise guidelines for how and what data on sustainability must be disclosed.

But why is it there? The High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance (HLEG) of the EU worked on the SFDR from 2016 to 2018. For the EU to accomplish two objectives, HLEG created a roadmap: (1) Integrate sustainability concerns into the financial system; and (2) Direct capital flow toward sustainable initiatives.

The European Commission unveiled its first Sustainable Finance Action Plan with the SFDR as one of its main foundations in order to execute the HLEG agenda.

The Goals of the SFDR

Despite its complexity, the SFDR has a straightforward goal: by providing more sustainability-related information, it is possible to prevent the “greenwashing” of financial goods and financial advice in the EU. In order for EU investors to make investment decisions in accordance with their sustainability objectives, SFDR strives to provide them with the information they need.

The SFDR proposes the idea of Principal Adverse Impacts to accomplish its goals (PAIs). As a fundamental SFDR unit, PAIs are crucial to comprehending the rule. PAIs are the adverse consequences that a financial choice or piece of advice may have on sustainability aspects. Environmental, social, and employee concerns are cited as sustainability elements, along with issues pertaining to human rights, anti-corruption, and anti-bribery.

Effects of SFDR

On the surface, the SFDR seems to significantly increase the administrative work necessary to satisfy the disclosure obligations. For those who provide financial goods and advice, it has a deeper, more significant normative consequence.

The SFDR effectively mandates that businesses make strategic choices regarding their sustainability strategy via the disclosure obligations. ICMA noted for instance, suppliers must determine whether to assess the effect on sustainability in order to describe how a product affects sustainability. Does the service provider have a method in place to gauge these effects? If so, how does it operate? Should it create a system if not? Which products aim to reduce PAIs, and which don’t? Where PAIs are not taken into account, the SFDR demands a detailed justification.

The SFDR may also provide the appearance of choice. For instance, scoped entities first seem to be able to claim that they just do not account for PAIs. After 30 June 2021, this option is deleted for organizations with more than 500 workers.

Main Requirements for SFDR

But what exactly is required under the SFDR? Sustainability implications for scoped entities must be recognized and communicated at both the entity and product levels.

The SFDR requires businesses to provide a number of disclosures at the entity level:

  • Information or financial advice on how an organization incorporates sustainability risks into its decision-making process for investments.
  • A policy statement outlining how an organization evaluates PAIS in relation to sustainability concerns.
  • Information on the compatibility of compensation practices with the incorporation of sustainability risks.
  • Pre-contractual disclosures on sustainability risk integration, together with evaluations of how such risks can influence the performance of financial products.

Depending on the goal of a particular product, the SDFR compels corporations to provide a further series of disclosures at the product level:

  • An explanation of how financial products account for these consequences should be given for businesses that do take PAIs into consideration. This holds true for all of the company’s goods, whether or not they are designed to satisfy sustainability objectives;
  • There must be more details on how “Article 8” items that promote “Environmental” or “Social” features are satisfied, including disclosure on the level of Taxonomy alignment of underlying economic activity.
  • For “Article 9” goods with sustainable investment as a goal, there has to be further information on conformity with the EU Taxonomy Regulation as well as an explanation of how the goal is accomplished.

Implementation Goals for SFDR

So far, so easy. Let’s wrap up by explaining the SFDR schedule. The SFDR has a staggered implementation strategy, with certain clauses taking effect over a longer period of time. In addition, Level 2 measures, sometimes referred to as Regulatory Technical Standards, will include crucial information about the nature and format of disclosures as well as the markers for PAIs. Importantly, there is additional uncertainty since these Level 2 metrics have not been finalized.

The Level 2 will be applicable at a later time, probably on January 1, 2022, according to the European Commission. However, the Commission made it clear that starting on March 10, 2021, businesses must abide by the SFDR’s high-level and principle-based criteria.

SFDR: Implementation date of March 2021

The “Level 1” text of the SFDR, which is scheduled to take effect on March 10, 2021, has been completed and released. However, similar to many EU regulations, the SFDR requires the implementation of a number of comprehensive “Level 2” Delegated Regulations or “RTS” before market players have a clear understanding of how the law is meant to be applied. The European Supervisory Authorities have provided feedback on the draft RTS, but they have not yet been finalized.

The European Commission (ECletter)’s makes it plain that the RTS’s implementation would be postponed “until a later stage,” as many had anticipated it would be. The Level 1 wording of the SFDR will still apply as of March 10, 2021, according to the EC’s letter. Given that it would oblige businesses to comply with what is essentially an unfinished set of rules by the EU, this has naturally created worry among both EU and non-EU enterprises that may be ensnared by the SFDR’s vast reach. In an effort to reduce some of the confusion that this change has caused, we have provided some remarks on the present condition of the game below.

Final words

In conclusion, the SFDR will have a major effect on further disclosure. This can include creating and disseminating fresh protocols for the entities impacted by its demands. It will probably also encourage strategic decisions on how a company should approach sustainability. Finally, SFDR will slam investors with a tsunami of fresh data on sustainability. The accessibility of pertinent business data that feeds into these disclosures by financial market players is a frequently voiced worry. The effects of the SFDR movement are still very much being felt in numerous ways.